By Lauren HittnerThe driverless school bus, which uses the Internet to connect riders with drivers, has become an integral part of the transportation system in California.
Now, a new report from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is putting a new spin on the technology.
The NTSB says it’s concerned that driverless vehicles may be more dangerous than conventional vehicles.
The report is titled “Driverless Vehicles: Are They Safer than Conventional Vehicles?” and outlines some of the challenges it says autonomous vehicles will face.
The report also says that a pilot program that was launched in 2016 was a failure.
The NTSB, which is made up of representatives from federal, state, local and tribal government agencies, has spent a lot of time looking at how technology could improve transportation.
In fact, it is one of the most influential bodies in transportation.
The first step of the investigation was to take a look at the state of the U.S. transportation system.
The agency looked at the costs and benefits of all modes of transportation, including buses, trains, taxis, and even cruise ships.
The study was done by analyzing data from more than 2,000 transportation systems in the United States and other countries.
The main thing that emerged was that driver-less transportation has some significant advantages over traditional transport systems, including lower operating costs, fewer accidents, fewer human error, lower emissions, and lower carbon emissions.
The problem is, that the technologies that are developed and used are not necessarily the best ones.
In the case of the bus, it’s an interesting one because it’s a hybrid of a car and a vehicle.
The bus itself is a bus, but the driver is the vehicle.
You don’t need to have a driver to operate the bus.
The system does the rest.
You’re sitting in the driver’s seat, and the driver can operate the vehicle on his own.
And this is the kind of vehicle that you’d use to get around in a typical day, not a car.
In other words, you’d be paying more for the vehicle that has the technology and the autonomy, but also you’re paying more to the driver.
In an automated bus, the driver, in addition to being responsible for the bus’ operation, is also responsible for monitoring the vehicle’s speed and braking ability, and communicating with the passengers in the backseat.
It also provides a lot more situational awareness, and allows the driver to monitor other aspects of the vehicle, such as its speed and distance.
The system also allows for the driver-to-operator communication.
In some cases, the bus can provide information to the passengers, like when the bus is coming or going to a stop, and when it’s stopping.
This is one area where the technology is going to be really important to get right.
The other area is where it is going be really challenging to get there.
In terms of what it means for us, the question is: What do we actually need to do to be safe?
The safety benefits are there.
We can have driverless buses that go to school, and it will save the school district millions of dollars, and that’s a good thing.
But if there are other problems that the system is causing, that is a different question.
We want to make sure we don’t have any crashes.
And we want to do everything we can to reduce the number of crashes, but there is no magic bullet.
The problems that we’ve identified with driverless vehicle technology are all real, and there’s a lot to be concerned about, and this is just a starting point.
The next step is going after those problems.
The questions are: How do we make sure that we’re not creating a system that’s more dangerous?
What are we going to do about it?